Moore's Paradox, Introspection and Doxastic Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Moore’s Paradox, Introspection and Doxastic Logic
An analysis of Moore’s paradox is given in doxastic logic. Logics arising from formalizations of various introspective principles are compared; one logic, K5c, emerges as privileged in the sense that it is the weakest to avoid Moorean belief. Moreover it has other attractive properties, one of which is that it can be justified solely in terms of avoiding false belief. Introspection is therefore...
متن کاملDynamic Doxastic Probability Logic
In this paper we will propose a dynamic doxastic probability logic which is inspired by two already existing systems and tries to meet them somewhere in between. On the one hand you have the original simple Kooi system of public announcement logic with hard public information only, and on the other hand you have the very rich and powerful BGK system of van Benthem, Gerbandy and Kooi [5]. Public...
متن کاملSequence Semantics for Doxastic Logic
In this paper we investigate sequence semantics for the modal logic of belief. This semantics differs from the previously considered in this that it allows flexibility in dealing with beliefsthose does not need to be closed under provability. We prove completeness theorem for such logic (with respect to this semantics) and show that stable theories correspond to constant models. Department of C...
متن کاملDoxastic Paradox and Reputation Effects in Iterated Games
The "chain-store paradox" of Reinhard Sehen is one of a number of scenarios involving the finite repetition of a certain kind of sub-game about which a paradoxical conclusion can be derived. In each of these cases, a backward-induction argument is used to prove that it is futile to try to establish a reputation for cooperative or punitive behavior through appropriate action in the early stages ...
متن کاملMoore’s Paradox, Direct Doxastic Voluntarism, and Atheist Distrust
The concept of belief is analyzed and then discussed within the context of the current climate of atheist distrust in America. To begin, Moore’s Paradox, and its relationship to an important claim made by Wittgenstein regarding false beliefs, is explored. Next, the definition of belief that results from affirming Wittgenstein’s claim is outlined and subsequently defended from an attempted refut...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy
سال: 2015
ISSN: 2161-2234,2161-2234
DOI: 10.1002/tht3.181